Results to Ratification

Effective, Consistent and Reliable
Method for Collecting Student Assessment Data 

The Results to Ratification - or R2R - process is being implemented gradually over multiple sessions.

The R2R process is executed in four phases each session:

  1. Gradebook Setup
  2. Preparation of Results
  3. Review of Results
  4. Result Upload and Ratification

Who will be involved in the process?

To ensure a seamless ratification process, the involvement of Unit Convenors, Heads of Schools, Education Support Officers, and the Learning Design and Production Team is essential. Each group brings unique expertise and plays a critical role at different stages, from initial review to final approval and implementation.

The Faculty of Arts adheres to the Unit of Study Monitoring and Grade Ratification Policy and Procedures, which supports the assurance, enhancement, and improvement of the quality, integrity, and relevance of the University's suite of units of study.

Results to Ratification Process Timeline

Academic Week

Process

Week 13

  • Unit Convenors and LD&P Team do final gradebook checks

Exam Weeks 1 & 2

  • Unit Convenor finalise grades of units without final exams

Exam Week 3

  • By the end of the week, results and Form A are due from the Unit Convenor
  • Start of School/ Discipline Marks Moderation Meetings Period

Session Break Week 1

  • End of School/ Discipline Marks Moderation Meetings Period
  • Education Support Officers enter grades in AMIS
  • Form B due from Heads of Schools
  • Faculty Education Committee Marks Meeting

Session Break Week 2

  • Form C due from Deputy Dean Education & Employability
  • Faculty Board Results Ratification Meeting
  • Results released

Session Start

  • Unit Convenors and LD&P Team set up assessments in iLearn and Gradebook

Throughout the Session

  • Monitor Gradebook & Dashboard