Results to Ratification

Effective, Consistent and Reliable
Method for Collecting Student Assessment Data

The Results to Ratification - or R2R - process is being implemented gradually over multiple sessions.

The R2R process is executed in four phases each session: distinct groups of staff will be primarily responsible during different phases, according to their roles and expertise within the assessment and ratification process

Phase 1: Gradebook Setup (LD&P Team and Unit Convenor)

The first step of this project is supporting you in setting up gradebook so that all units share a consistent gradebook format—one that is customisable and clear in its calculation of students' results. The Learning Design & Production Team and unit convenors are jointly responsible for guiding and implementing this setup, ensuring both technical accuracy and alignment with unit activities and assessment policies

Five important steps:

STEP 1: For every assessment task, create a matching category.
(and remember that every assessment is to be marked /100).
STEP 2: Organise your grade book by moving assessment activities into categories.
STEP 3: Create a ‘Non-Assessed’ category.
STEP 4: Set the weightings and aggregation methods of categories.
STEP 5: Create a ‘Grade Override’ category.

You can use this checklist for future reference.

Phase 2: Preparation of Results (Unit Convenor and Teaching Staff)

Gradebook Results Preparation

Unit convenors are responsible for the gradebook set-up and results preparation phases. The initial set-up of the gradebook (Phase 1) establishes a unit-level footprint in the ‘Unit Grade and Group Monitoring’ dashboard. This integration enables the automatic extraction of student assessment data from the gradebook at regular intervals, providing a comprehensive overview of student performance. Unit convenors can use this data to review and quality assure results throughout the session, supporting a smooth transition to results ratification.

Dashboard Access

Access to the dashboard is provided to all unit convenors and co-unit convenors as identified in iTeach. Access permissions are managed and updated periodically. Those requiring access can follow the 'Request Access’ process by submitting relevant role details via OneHelp.

Please be aware that this is not the Unit Profile Dashboard linked on iLearn, but the Unit Grade and Group Monitoring Dashboard for results ratification and processing.

Dashboard Features

The dashboard presents a variety of views and data visualisations, developed through extensive pilot feedback and academic consultation. Further information and guidance on optimising the use of the Unit Grade and Group Monitoring dashboard can be found in Phase 3: Review of Results.

Phase 3: Review of Results(Head of Discipline and Head of School)

Results Review and Ratification

After the gradebook has been set up (Phase 1) and results have been prepared (Phase 2), the next step is to review results and recommend them for final ratification by the relevant Faculty Board. During this phase, Heads of Discipline and Heads of School are responsible for leading the review of results, ensuring moderation and ratification. This phase provides an overview of how to maximise the use of the available dashboard.

The Dashboard

The ‘Unit Grade and Group Monitoring’ dashboard automatically extracts student assessment data from the gradebook at regular intervals, presenting a comprehensive view of student performance. Multiple views and data visualisations are available.

Review of Results

The dashboard displays all student data required for the ratification of results within schools, departments, and faculties. By using the Power BI dashboard during meetings, the process of displaying and reporting results becomes more efficient, consistent, and reliable. This approach allows unit convenors and academic staff to focus on moderation, quality assurance, and maintaining assessment standards, rather than on manual data manipulation and report generation during peak results processing periods.

Phase 4: Result Upload and Ratification (Educational Services Team)

Finalising Results: Upload to AMIS

In the final phase, reviewed results are uploaded to AMIS by Educational Services teams. This process ensures accuracy and minimises manual handling. The key steps undertaken by professional staff are outlined below:

Step 1: Access the Unit Grade and Group Monitoring dashboard.
Step 2: Extract student results from the Unit Results Export page.
Step 3: Import the extracted results into AMIS using a secure, cloud-based application.

No further amendments to the results are required after extraction from the dashboard, streamlining the process and reducing the risk of errors.

Find a detailed guide how to export and import results here.

Who will be involved in the process?

To ensure a seamless ratification process, the involvement of Unit Convenors, Heads of Discipline and Heads of School, Education Support Officers, and the Learning Design and Production Team is essential. Each group plays a role at different stages, from initial review to final approval and implementation.

The Faculty of Arts adheres to the Unit of Study Monitoring and Grade Ratification Policy and Procedures, which supports the assurance, enhancement, and improvement of the quality, integrity, and relevance of the University's suite of units of study.

Unit Convenor (Phase 1 and 2)

To guarantee that all evaluations are appropriately documented, unit convenors are in charge of setting up gradebook.

The Unit Convenor will finalise their grades in the approved university system, examine performance data, student feedback and engagement data, and complete the Unit Monitoring and Grade Ratification Report (Form A on iTeach from 2026 on, Moderation Checklist for Arts Faculty until then) identifying any issues.
Additionally, they will monitor the dashboard to track progress and address any issues that may arise.

Link to Dashboard

Head of School (Phase 3)

Faculty Authorities are responsible for ensuring adequate monitoring of units and review of grades is undertaken at the end of every study period in which units are offered, through a meeting or schedule of meetings.

The final grades for all units will be reviewed during these meetings and recommended to the Faculty Board for ratification.

The Head of School (or delegate such as Discipline Chairs or Director of Education) chairs the school moderation meetings, fostering collaboration and ensuring academic standards are maintained. Additionally, they are responsible for completing the Unit Group Monitoring Report (Form B on iTeach from 2026 on) and make recommendations to the Faculty Board as part of the ratification process.

Education Support Officer (Phase 4)

Faculty Education Committee (Phase 4)

The Deputy Dean Education & Employability chairs the Faculty’s Unit Monitoring and Grade Ratification Meetings.

The Faculty Unit Monitoring and Grade Ratification Meeting is responsible for endorsing final grades for units within its jurisdiction, conducting a cohort investigation if required, and examining unit monitoring and grade ratification reports where appropriate, including Form B.

Faculty of Arts Faculty Board (Phase 4)

Learning Design and Production Team (ongoing support)

Results to Ratification Process Timeline

Find a downloadable Timeline Checklist here

Academic Week	Process
Week 0/ Session Start	Unit Convenors and LD&P Team set up assessments in iLearn and Gradebook
Throughout the Session	Unit Convenors monitor Gradebook & Dashboard
Week 13	Unit Convenors and LD&P Team do final gradebook checks
Exam Weeks 1 & 2	Unit Convenors finalise grades of units without final exams
Exam Week 3	Unit Convenors submit Form A/ Unit Moderation Report Unit Convenors present results at School/ Discipline Marks Moderation Meetings Period
Session Break Week 1	Head of Discipline and School review results Education Support Officers start entering grades in AMIS Heads of School submit Form B/ School Moderation Report Heads of School attend Faculty Education Committee Marks Meeting
Session Break Week 2	Education Support Officers finalise results upload Deputy Dean Education & Employability submits Form C Faculty Board Results Ratification Meeting ratifies results Results released

Effective, Consistent and Reliable Method for Collecting Student Assessment Data

Who will be involved in the process?

Results to Ratification Process Timeline

Effective, Consistent and Reliable
Method for Collecting Student Assessment Data